All comparisons
Doyna vs. Microsoft 365 Copilot8 min read

Microsoft Copilot alternative — Doyna for teams who don't want vendor lock-in

Microsoft 365 Copilot is the easy choice if your company runs entirely on Microsoft. If you don't, or if data residency, on-prem deployment, or pricing flexibility matter, Doyna is the alternative — same AI horsepower, cleaner data deal, half the cost.

FeatureDoynaMicrosoft 365 Copilot
Works with Gmail / Google WorkspaceYes — full bi-directional syncNo — Microsoft 365 only
Works with Microsoft 365Yes — Outlook, OneDrive, SharePoint, TeamsYes — native
Self-hosted / on-premYes — air-gapped optionNo
EU data residencyYes — Frankfurt or your infrastructureEU Data Boundary (still uses M365 cloud)
Pricing per user/month€23–€472 across 4 tiers$30 (single tier, requires M365 E3/E5)
Total cost (M365 + AI)€23–€472$23 (M365 E3) + $30 (Copilot) = $53/user min
Native RomanianYes — embeddings + voiceTranslation layer (improving but not native)
Document generationPPTX + PDF + Word, grounded in your dataYes — drafts in Word/PPT/Excel
Knowledge graph across non-Microsoft sourcesYesLimited to Microsoft Graph
Annual contract requirementNoYes (annual M365 + Copilot license)

TLDR

If you're looking at Microsoft 365 Copilot but the math doesn't work — your company is on Gmail, you need EU data residency, you can't get to $53/user/month, or you want to run AI on your own metal — Doyna is the alternative. Same primary jobs (search across company data, AI chat, document drafting), no Microsoft lock-in, no annual contract floor, and works with Gmail and Microsoft 365.

Who this is for

Microsoft 365 Copilot is a great product for one specific buyer: a company already on Microsoft 365 E3 or E5, with all knowledge work happening inside Word / Excel / PowerPoint / Outlook, that wants AI inline in those tools and doesn't mind paying the additional $30/user/month.

If that's you, buy Copilot. We mean it.

This page is for the buyers Copilot doesn't fit:

  • Companies on Gmail and Google Workspace, where Copilot doesn't work at all.
  • Hybrid teams running half on Microsoft and half on something else, where Copilot is blind to the half it doesn't own.
  • EU-regulated companies that can't accept Microsoft's EU Data Boundary as a sufficient data-residency control.
  • Romanian / Bulgarian / Polish mid-market companies where Copilot's language quality is good but not native, and the $53/user/month floor is hard to justify.
  • Self-hosting requirements — regulated industries, defense suppliers, healthcare, or anyone whose IT policy prohibits email contents in any cloud.
  • Sub-50-person companies that don't want to commit to an annual M365 + Copilot contract.

What you actually pay for Copilot

The headline price for Microsoft 365 Copilot is $30/user/month. The honest price includes the underlying license you need to even use it:

What you needCost (USD/user/month)
Microsoft 365 Business Basic$6 — Copilot does NOT work on this
Microsoft 365 Business Standard$12.50 — Copilot does NOT work on this
Microsoft 365 Business Premium$22 — Copilot works (since 2024)
Microsoft 365 E3$23 — most common Copilot floor
Microsoft 365 E5$57
Copilot add-on$30
Real floor (Business Premium + Copilot)$52
E3 + Copilot$53
E5 + Copilot$87

So when someone says "Copilot is $30/user/month," they're hiding the $22–$57 underneath. For an EU buyer, that translates to roughly €48–€81 per user per month at current rates, on an annual contract.

Doyna's Team tier is €157 per user per month total — that includes the assistant, search, knowledge graph, document generation, and project management. Doyna's Starter is €23 per user per month total. There's no productivity-suite license you also need to pay for.

For a 15-person team:

  • M365 E3 + Copilot: ~$795/month minimum (€735) → €8,820/year
  • Doyna Team: €2,355/month → €28,260/year

Doyna's Team plan costs more on absolute dollars at this scale, because it's a heavier product (project management, doc generation, knowledge graph). For a like-for-like comparison, Doyna Professional (€62/user/month) at 15 seats = €930/month, which is $580/month cheaper than Copilot. The honest message: Doyna isn't always cheaper, but it's always more deployable and never locked-in.

How Doyna and Copilot overlap

Both can read your email and documents, draft replies, generate slide decks and Word memos, and answer questions about your company data with citations. Both respect Microsoft's existing permission model when integrated with M365. Both run on top of frontier LLMs (Doyna uses a multi-vendor model gateway; Copilot uses GPT-4-class models exclusively).

If you've used Copilot's chat panel inside Outlook and asked it "what did Maria say about the Q2 forecast last month," Doyna does the same thing — it just also works for Gmail, Slack, Pipedrive, and your other tools.

Where Copilot is better

  • In-line Office editing. Copilot lives inside the Word ribbon, the Excel formula bar, the PowerPoint outline. If your users spend 6 hours a day in Office, that surface area matters.
  • Microsoft Graph depth. Copilot has access to Microsoft signals (calendar attendees, document modification graph, Teams reactions) that an external tool can never fully replicate.
  • Compliance certifications. Microsoft has every certification known. Doyna has SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001; Microsoft has those plus everything else.
  • Procurement. If your company already has a Microsoft enterprise agreement, adding Copilot is a paperwork exercise. Adding any external tool is a vendor-onboarding exercise.

Where Doyna is better

  • Outside the Microsoft ecosystem. Gmail, Google Workspace, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Notion, anything that isn't owned by Microsoft.
  • Data residency control. Frankfurt by default, or your own infrastructure. No Microsoft cloud anywhere in the path.
  • Total cost at small scale. A 5-person team pays €23×5 = €115/month on Starter, vs. ~$265/month minimum on M365 + Copilot.
  • Self-hosted deployment. Air-gapped, on your VMs, on bare metal. Copilot doesn't offer this and isn't planning to.
  • Romanian language quality. Doyna's Romanian is native-trained; Copilot's Romanian is improving but still translation-flavored.
  • No annual contract floor. Doyna bills monthly on Starter and Pro. Copilot is annual.
  • Document generation outside Office. Doyna produces PDF reports and Markdown memos as first-class artifacts; Copilot is Office-only.

How to decide

Three questions answer this for most buyers:

  1. Do you run Gmail or hybrid? If yes, Copilot is out. Doyna or another non-Microsoft AI is the only real choice.
  2. Do you need EU data residency or self-hosted deployment? If yes, Microsoft's EU Data Boundary may not satisfy your legal team. Doyna's Frankfurt or self-hosted path is cleaner.
  3. Are you a 5–50 person company? If yes, the Copilot floor of $53/user × annual is steep. Doyna's monthly billing on Starter and Pro is friendlier.

If all three are "no" and you're a 200-person Microsoft shop, Copilot is the easier choice. If any one is "yes," Doyna is the alternative built for that exact constraint.

Next steps

Compare Doyna's pricing against your current M365 + Copilot bill, read about security and data residency, or book a walkthrough — we'll show you Doyna running on real M365 data in 30 minutes.

Frequently asked questions

Is Doyna a real alternative to Microsoft 365 Copilot?
Yes, with one caveat: if your company runs 100% on Microsoft 365 and you don't care about data residency, Copilot's deep Office integration is hard to beat. For everyone else — companies on Gmail, hybrid Microsoft + Google teams, EU-regulated industries, or anyone who balks at Copilot's $30/user/month on top of M365 licensing — Doyna does the same primary jobs at a lower total cost without the lock-in.
What does Microsoft Copilot actually cost?
Copilot is $30/user/month, but it requires an underlying Microsoft 365 license, typically E3 ($23/user/month) or E5 ($57/user/month). So the real floor is $53/user/month, and an annual contract. Doyna's Team tier, which is what most 5–15 person companies pick, is €157/user/month — but unlike Copilot, that includes the AI assistant, semantic search, knowledge graph, document generation, and project management. There's no separate productivity-suite license you also need to pay for.
Why would a company on Microsoft 365 still pick Doyna?
Three common reasons. (1) Data residency: Microsoft's EU Data Boundary still routes through Microsoft cloud; Doyna can run in Frankfurt or on your own metal with no Microsoft dependency. (2) Cross-tool search: Copilot can only see Microsoft 365 content; if you also use HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Notion, or anything outside Microsoft Graph, Copilot is blind to it. Doyna isn't. (3) Self-hosting: regulated industries that can't put email contents in any cloud need on-prem; Copilot doesn't offer that.
Where does Microsoft Copilot win?
If your company is on M365 E5 already, your users live inside Word/Excel/PowerPoint, and you don't need to search outside the Microsoft ecosystem, Copilot's deep Office integration is more mature than Doyna's add-in story. It can co-author a Word document or generate Excel formulas in-context faster than any external tool. Doyna integrates with M365 but doesn't ship inside the Office ribbon — we run as a desktop app and a web dashboard.
Can Doyna replace Microsoft 365 Copilot for a 50-person company?
For most 50-person companies, yes — particularly if you're on the Romanian, Bulgarian, or Polish mid-market where M365 Copilot adoption has been slow due to language quality and price. The migration takes 2–4 weeks: connect M365 to Doyna, give it 2 days to index, train your team in a 30-minute session, and you're running. We've done this for three customers in 2026.
Does Doyna train its model on our data?
No. Zero training, contractually, on every plan including Starter. Each customer runs in a single-tenant database with no embeddings or queries crossing the tenancy boundary. Microsoft makes a similar guarantee for Copilot Enterprise, but Microsoft's training data scope across the broader M365 ecosystem is more complex; Doyna's architecture is simpler.